12 次代码提交 (5a114974-bb09-4234-be91-e58673452e09)

作者 SHA1 备注 提交日期
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 5a114974 Transitioning data handling to Relay, so Lobby will only be responsible for the data useful for getting players into the lobby. I'm also fixing a bug where the lobby list heartbeat would never stop. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 5fa60706 Starting to shift responsibility off of lobby. Now, once a player is connected to Relay, the local player data will update from that instead of from the lobby. The data are still written to the lobby currently, however. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com fbb0cb37 Adding inclusion of initial player data to lobby creation/join. Adding logic for Relay hosts to ferry network events from client to client. A bit of progress on changing the flow of user state to account for Relay, but that's still mostly in-progress. Adding client heartbeat to keep the UTP connection alive. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 98fff65d Downgrading to 2020.3, since none of the service package dependencies need a higher version. I've also removed a few unused packages, mostly for 2D sprites which we don't need. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com d1773d39 Consolidating and renaming for readability. This still represents the baseline Relay + UTP behavior, without removing existing Lobby behavior yet or handling edge cases. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 42fe907a Almost actual progress: This now has the two clients connecting to Relay on join, with the host keeping the allocation alive, and they will send each other changes to their name, emote, and ready immediately. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 678fd232 Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, *actually* used correctly in the sample? 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 85184572 Partial progress - I wanted to verify how to do the data sending before breaking out into another class. This will now send the client's name to the server on connection. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com c2cfe060 Partial progress. Consolidating a little more, should be able to start breaking things out from here. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com cdaa3722 More partial progress: I'm sending a byte from the client and receiving it on the host, though I don't yet know how and it's a sloppy copy-paste. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com abd52623 Partial progress: Following a trio of Relay+UTP samples, I seem to have something that will bind a transport to Relay and keep the connection open (as evident from the fact that a client can join after what would be the 10s timeout on Relay and successfully get the JoinAllocation, when they wouldn't without keeping the connection open even when binding was correct). However, this current code is very slapdash and sloppy; I'm just committing now as a very rough draft. 3 年前
nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com 80161691 Creating a staging branch, which will serve to contain the changes for reintroducing the packages and project ID that are scrubbed from the releases. 3 年前