com.unity.services.samples.game-lobby

文件历史

nathaniel.buck@unity3d.com d1773d39 Consolidating and renaming for readability. This still represents the baseline Relay + UTP behavior, without removing existing Lobby behavior yet or handling edge cases.		3 年前
..
RelayInterface.cs	Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, actually used correctly in the sample?	3 年前
RelayInterface.cs.meta	Latest Dev and Readme without Vivox	3 年前
RelayUtpClient.cs	Consolidating and renaming for readability. This still represents the baseline Relay + UTP behavior, without removing existing Lobby behavior yet or handling edge cases.	3 年前
RelayUtpClient.cs.meta	Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, actually used correctly in the sample?	3 年前
RelayUtpHost.cs	Consolidating and renaming for readability. This still represents the baseline Relay + UTP behavior, without removing existing Lobby behavior yet or handling edge cases.	3 年前
RelayUtpHost.cs.meta	Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, actually used correctly in the sample?	3 年前
RelayUtpSetup.cs	Consolidating and renaming for readability. This still represents the baseline Relay + UTP behavior, without removing existing Lobby behavior yet or handling edge cases.	3 年前
RelayUtpSetup.cs.meta	Partial progress: Following a trio of Relay+UTP samples, I seem to have something that will bind a transport to Relay and keep the connection open (as evident from the fact that a client can join after what would be the 10s timeout on Relay and successfully get the JoinAllocation, when they wouldn't without keeping the connection open even when binding was correct). However, this current code is very slapdash and sloppy; I'm just committing now as a very rough draft.	3 年前