com.unity.services.samples.game-lobby

文件历史

Jacob Stove Lorentzen e876c95b NGO Error spam Fix. -Reduced the amount of NetworkMonobehaviours on the glyphs -Increased the Queue Limit on the Transport.		3 年前
..
AsyncRequestRelay.cs	Merging the error code exception branch.	3 年前
AsyncRequestRelay.cs.meta	Changing the error pop-up to handle the LobbyServiceException with more player-facing error output. The same work for Relay will follow if the package is in a usable state.	3 年前
RelayAPIInterface.cs	NGO Error spam Fix.	3 年前
RelayAPIInterface.cs.meta	Latest Dev and Readme without Vivox	4 年前
RelayPendingApproval.cs	Primary rejection behavior - A host will reject an incoming client if the lobby is already in the in-game state. Clients will now no longer send data until they are approved, but once approved, connection completes as usual.	3 年前
RelayPendingApproval.cs.meta	Primary rejection behavior - A host will reject an incoming client if the lobby is already in the in-game state. Clients will now no longer send data until they are approved, but once approved, connection completes as usual.	3 年前
RelayUtpClient.cs	Added Comments and clarified some class names.	3 年前
RelayUtpClient.cs.meta	Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, actually used correctly in the sample?	3 年前
RelayUtpHost.cs	Added Comments and clarified some class names.	3 年前
RelayUtpHost.cs.meta	Still partial progress. I have a little handoff going where the client identifies itself to the server and the server responds with an ID to use in further communication. However, I don't think that will actually work since all clients would also need those IDs? I can just send the user ID, which takes up more bandwidth but not dramatically so. Also, this pinpoints the heartbeat for keeping the Relay allocation up. I'm trying to pull out all the job system things, since that both seems like an extra layer of complexity that devs would have to learn and it also isn't, like, actually used correctly in the sample?	3 年前
RelayUtpSetup.cs	Addressing remaining TODOs (which are all either outdated, handled in other changesets, or captured as a work item). Also addressing a couple compiler warnings -- one to suppress when DTLS isn't available and one for a deprecated Relay API.	3 年前
RelayUtpSetup.cs.meta	Partial progress: Following a trio of Relay+UTP samples, I seem to have something that will bind a transport to Relay and keep the connection open (as evident from the fact that a client can join after what would be the 10s timeout on Relay and successfully get the JoinAllocation, when they wouldn't without keeping the connection open even when binding was correct). However, this current code is very slapdash and sloppy; I'm just committing now as a very rough draft.	3 年前